O'Reilly apparently said
last night that keeping religious beliefs out of science classes is fascism. I'm not kidding. Other people can deal with that
. Here's the problem, though. O'Reilly said
Intelligent design says life on earth is too complex to have developed through evolution and that a higher power might be involved.
Explain this to me: Doesn't the argument that life is so complex that it must have been designed by a vast, omnipotent, infinitely more complex
intelligence seem to refute itself? Who built that intelligence? And the previous one? Carry this argument out to a million builders...