Thursday, September 01, 2005

Let them eat pork (barrel spending)

Just last year, the Army Corps of Engineers sought $105 million for hurricane and flood programs in New Orleans. The White House slashed the request to about $40 million. Congress finally approved $42.2 million, less than half of the agency's request.

Yet the lawmakers and Bush agreed to a $286.4 billion pork-laden highway bill that included more than 6,000 pet projects for lawmakers. Congress spent money on dust control for Arkansas roads, a warehouse on the Erie Canal and a $231 million bridge to a small, uninhabited Alaskan island.

How could Washington spend $231 million on a bridge to nowhere - and not find $42 million for hurricane and flood projects in New Orleans? It's a matter of power and politics.

Alaska is represented by Republican Rep. Don Young, chairman of the House Transportation Committee, and Republican Sen. Ted Stevens, a senior member of the all-important Senate Appropriations Committee. Louisiana's delegation holds far less sway.
This article's an excellent example of what reporting should be, not two tribes going to war over a topic, but a thoughtful investigation into how we got where we are today.


Anonymous Bob said...

Under the old federal transportation bill (TEA-21), between 1998 and 2003 Louisiana received only 90 cents for every dollar in gas tax revenue sent they sent to Washington. As for Alaska's rate of return: $6.08.

12:18 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home