Wednesday, August 02, 2006


It's working, but not for us. James Fallows, writing in Atlantic Monthly, explains that, yes, we've hit Al Qaeda, but, as feared, our actions could be making things worse.
When Americans think of satellite surveillance and the National Security Agency, they are likely to imagine something out of the TV show 24: a limitless set of eyes in the sky that can watch everything, all the time. In fact, even today’s amply funded NSA can watch only a limited number of sites. “Our overhead imagery is dedicated to force protection in Iraq and Afghanistan,” I was told by a former intelligence official who would not let me use his name. He meant that the satellites are tied up following U.S. troops on patrol and in firefights to let them know who might be waiting in ambush. “There are still ammo dumps in Iraq that are open to insurgents,” he said, “but we lack the imagery to cover them—let alone what people might be dreaming up in Thailand or Bangladesh.” Because so many spy satellites are trained on the countries we have invaded, they tell us less than they used to about the rest of the world.

Documents captured after 9/11 showed that bin Laden hoped to provoke the United States into an invasion and occupation that would entail all the complications that have arisen in Iraq. His only error was to think that the place where Americans would get stuck would be Afghanistan.


Blogger antiwisdom said...

ugh. That's assuming they stop with Iraq. Their itchy trigger fingers are already pointing at Syran, as a vapid fool recently called Syria and Iran.

7:32 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home