Saturday, May 29, 2010

The first domino falls?

So, WaPo has started taking on parts of the Mark Kirk story.
Rep. Mark Kirk, a Navy reservist who was elected to Congress in 2001, acknowledged the error in his official biography after The Washington Post began looking into whether he had received the prestigious award, which is given by top Navy officials to a single individual annually.


In a message on his blog, Kirk wrote that "upon a recent review of my records, I found that an award listed in my official biography was misidentified" and that the award he had intended to list was given to his unit, not to him individually.

Kirk was assigned to a unit based in Aviano, Italy, during the conflict. A professional group, the National Military Intelligence Association, gave the unit an award for outstanding service, according to a revised résumé posted on Kirk's Web site Saturday.

The association's Vice Admiral Rufus L. Taylor Award celebrates "the exceptional achievements of an outstanding Naval Intelligence career professional," but the citation in 2000 contains no mention of Kirk and instead designates the entire Intelligence Division Electronic Attack Wing at Aviano.

Kirk, whose campaign has emphasized his military service as a reservist, similarly misstated the award during a House committee hearing in March 2002. In a remark recorded by C-Span, he said, "I was the Navy's Intelligence Officer of the Year," an achievement he depicted as providing special qualifications to discuss national security spending.
That's a good start, but readers of this blog know there's more to look into:
  • Why did Mark Kirk claim on his website to be "the only member of Congress to serve in Operation Iraqi Freedom" when he never deployed to the country?

  • Does Mark Kirk really equate his three-week Annual Training stints in the country with "deployments," which normally require months of service in the area of operations as well as significant pre-deployment training time? (Update: More on this here.)

  • Kirk has suggested he merely "serve(d) alongside our troops" like any other Reserve officer, but told a group of reporters during a press conference this about his mission in Afghanistan.
    "I came up with a number of recommendations that I gave to Gen. McChrystal," said Kirk, referring to the commander of military forces in Afghanistan. "We have a tremendous amount of combat power."
    I find it odd that Gen. Stanley McChrystal--the four star general who had been in charge of the Afghanistan mission for six months by the time Kirk arrived for his second tour, would need the advice of an O-5 who'd been in the country for three weeks. So, what, exactly, did Kirk do in the country? Was he working as a Representative--which would explain his discussion with the general--or as a Navy commander, which wouldn't?
Now that it's clear Kirk has been puffing up his military résumé, will reporters begin to look into this string of tales?

Update:One more thing. His original bio read:
The Navy named Kirk “Intelligence Officer of the Year” in 1999 for his combat service in Kosovo.
But the WaPo story says this about his Naval service record:
An official summary of Kirk's military service, released to The Post by the Navy last week, lists other awards and decorations, including two Navy and Marine Corps Commendation medals, a Joint Meritorious Unit Award, a Navy Unit Commendation, a Meritorious Unit Commendation, and a National Defense Service medal.
It's possible they left it out, but that list doesn't include a Navy Combat Action Ribbon, which Kirk should have earned if he'd had "combat service."

In fact, despite years of claiming he'd earned this award for "combat service," Kirk has tacitly admitted that he didn't perform combat service. The web site which once mentioned his grandiose award now says:
Kirk was awarded the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal for his Kosovo service in 1999.
The phrase "combat service" is conspicuously absent.

Civilians (and/or Kirk fans) might think I'm nitpicking here, but there's a real difference between being in a combat zone and earning hazardous duty pay and actually being in combat. Just ask the family of Admiral Mike Boorda, who committed suicide when it was discovered he had been wearing a device which had designated him as serving in direct combat, though it didn't show up in his records. David Hackworth, the former soldier who wrote the story on Boorda, wrote this after the admiral's suicide.
I pursued the story because for a soldier or sailor there's no greater disgrace than wearing unearned valor awards. Combat ribbons -- awards for which so many brave warriors have bled -- are the ultimate status symbol to warriors. They bring a special recognition and respect.

And with military leaders, from corporal to four-star rank, there's a larger issue: integrity. The very bedrock of any military organization is honor, doing the hard right over the easy wrong and standing tall in everything that's done.

Midshipmen at Annapolis, cadets at West Point, the Air Force Academy, all the ROTCs and other officer-producing schools in the land are taught the code, "I will not lie, cheat or steal nor tolerate anyone who does."

These sacred rules don't only apply to cadets, NCOs or junior grade officers, but to every leader who wears the uniform, from cadet to general, midshipmen to admiral.
While Kirk isn't wearing unearned ribbons, he has time and time again claimed the unearned glory of a veteran of two wars and the exalted status of a combat veteran of another.

You might get the name of an award wrong, but it's unlikely he forgot he wasn't in combat.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey I owe you an apology, I read your first post about this on Dkos and I did not think it was much. You have proved me wrong and I appreciate your persistence in following this story. So I am sorry I doubted you.

Thank you!

8:44 AM  
Blogger Nitpicker said...

No need for an apology.

9:38 AM  
Blogger Ellen Beth Gill said...

We tracked down the Rufus Taylor Award and note the problems in Kirk's story here.

Thank you for your fantastic reporting on this story.

5:43 PM  
Blogger Leslie said...

Isn't it ironic that Kirk lied about an award that was actually WON by Rufus Taylor many years ago?

9:03 AM  
Blogger SanMigMike said...

All due respect but if Zumwalt could think that Boorda deserved the "V" one could understand how a mistake could be made. I also find it interesting that Hackworth also seemed to be claiming for a while the Ranger tab and a DFC that was not earned. Interesting that one would be on a crusade against people that might be claiming unearned medals before cleaning their own house. Maybe Hackworth, among others, was a bit upset about some of Boorda's actions and policies?

Please don't take this to indicate that one should claim and wear awards, medals, wings that are not earned or awarded but I think at times honest mistakes can be made.

12:59 PM  
Blogger Nitpicker said...

Don't get me wrong, either. As I've written elsewhere, I fucking loved Boorda. Every enlisted sailor did, in fact.

For a long time I hated Hackworth and, yeah, he was guilty of his own transgressions, but it doesn't mean his choice of words in this instance was wrong.

1:08 PM  
Blogger  said...

Arthritis means inflammation of jointsMicrosoft Office 2010csdxumei02 It is one of several Office 2010diseases commonly called rheumatism. Arthritis arises from many causes and it is treated in many various methodsMicrosoft Office 2007Arthritis has been classified as follows: - * Arthritis caused by infection.airOffice 2007Arthritis has been classified as follows: - * Arthritis caused by infection.airMicrosoft OfficeRheumatoid arthritis. * Degenerative arthritis. * Arthritis due to joint injuries.supra shoes Office 2007 keyArthritis originating from the nervous Office 2007 downloadRheumatoid arthritis and arthritis caused by rheumatic Office 2007 Professionalfever are classified as collagen disease. * Rheumatoid arthritis and degenerative nfl jerseysMicrosoft outlooktwo common types. Millions of men and women Microsoft outlook 2010are afflicted with them. But good treatment begun early and continued faithfully can often do much to alleviate the pain

2:19 AM  
Blogger mewmewmew said...

It’s been said that the difference between the truth and fiction is that fiction has to make sense. After its third season, Battlestar Galactica steadily failed on both counts.

london escort
adult webcam chat

11:35 AM  
Anonymous iphone 5 said...

This is a great blog. thanks for providing this info. You have so much knowledge about this.
thanks for sharing…
iphone 5

3:41 AM  
Anonymous iPhone Application Developer said...

After its third season, Battlestar Galactica steadily failed on both counts. It’s been said that the difference between the truth and fiction is that fiction has to make sense. Thanks for sharing…

8:58 PM  
Anonymous iPhone Developer said...

It’s been said that the difference between the truth and fiction is that fiction has to make sense. Thanks for sharing…

4:11 AM  
Anonymous nfl jerseys cheap said...

Please don't wear this suggests that one should claim for compensation and awards, MEDALS, wings, don't make or grant but I think sometimes can make honest mistakes

12:07 AM  
Blogger Ethan Smith said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

6:31 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home